Strict Liability for Gatekeepers: A Reply to Professor Coffee

A reply to Professor Seedhouse.

This brief reply gives a few references and clarifies some points in order to emphasize that a number of Professor Seedhouse's assertions are debatable and that his criticism of slovenly scholarship and his unbridled ad hominem argumentation are out of place and easily refuted.

The Case Against Strict Liability

Commentary on Toward a Test for Strict Liability in Torts

strict liability; foundations and instances

strict liability is the result of philosophical ideas of lawyers in front of developments in human knowledge and complexity of social relationships. strict liability the main aim is facilitation of victim's compensation, so the proof of fault is not necessary and causation is sufficient. this type of liability is justified by various foundations of economics, society and morality. in the b...

The Uniform Commercial Code: A Reply to Professor Beutel